Compare real aggregators and their terms side-by-side
| Aggregator Type | Commission | Contract Length | Upfront Payment | Best For | Key Terms | Red Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Full Service Giants
e.g., South Pole, ClimatePartner
|
40-60% |
20-40 years
LOCKED
|
Sometimes (20-30% upfront) |
Small forests (< 50 ha) No other options |
Handles everything
Established buyers
All ecosystem rights
No transparency
|
• Gross revenue commission • Assignment without consent • Unlimited liability |
|
Regional Players
e.g., Arbonics, Tree.ly
|
30-40% |
10-20 years
|
Rarely |
Medium forests (50-200 ha) Seeking balance |
More flexible
Regional focus
Limited buyers
Slower sales
|
• Carbon rights only • Some transparency • Capped liability |
|
Light Touch Services
Boutique providers
|
20-30% |
5-10 years
|
Never |
Large forests (> 200 ha) With experience |
More control
Negotiable terms
Less support
You do more
|
• Net revenue basis • Exit clauses • Shared liability |
|
Cooperatives
RECOMMENDEDForest owner groups |
15-20% |
Flexible
|
Never |
Any size forest Smart owners unite |
Democratic control
Shared costs
Full transparency
Requires coordination
|
• Member governance • Open books • Flexible terms |
|
Direct Platforms
Puro.earth, Carbonfuture
|
10-15% |
No lock-in
|
Never |
Sophisticated operators DIY approach |
Maximum profit
Full control
You handle verification
Need expertise
|
• Transparent fees • No long contracts • You own everything |
|
Direct to Buyer
No intermediary
|
0% |
Negotiable
|
Possible |
Very large forests (> 500 ha) With buyer relationships |
100% revenue
Direct relationship
18-24 month process
High complexity
|
• You set all terms • Complete transparency • Maximum value capture |